Florida Lawyer Legal Services

Florida Lawyer News Services | Robbins Equitas

Call (866) 862-6878 and speak with an attorney

(Aviation accident attorney) Thomas & Wong Gen. Contractor v. The Lake Bank, N.A.

More info…
(U.S. 8th Cir., Banking Law, Civil Procedure) In a suit for failure to perform under a collateral transfer agreement, summary judgment for defendant is reversed and remanded where the suit is not barred by Minnesota’s credit-agreement statute of frauds since, although the collateral transfer agreement was an agreement to make a financial accommodation and therefore a credit agreement, plaintiff was not a debtor with respect to the agreement.


Lebron v. Sanders

(U.S. 2d Cir., Civil Procedure, Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Per Curiam) In a matter brought by habeas petitioner, motion for an extension of time to file motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for certificate of appealability with respect to writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) local district rules required respondent to provide petitioner with copies of unreported decisions or decisions reported exclusively on computerized databases that were cited in its opposition to the habeas petition; and 2) petitioner could not access, without cost, some of the federal case law that formed part of the substantive basis of the district court’s challenged opinion.


Stearn v. County San Bernardino

(Cal. App., Civil Procedure, Government Law, Property Law & Real Estate) In plaintiff’s challenge to defendant-county for its approval of 14 conditional use permits sought by respondent-real party interest to erect billboards, judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant-county is reversed where: 1) the trial court erred in dismissing the fourth cause of action for administrative mandamus under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5; 2) the expedited judicial review provided by section 1094.8 was available only when the license applicant or the issuing public agency filed an action challenging the grant or denial of a license for expressive conduct, not when a third party did so; and 3) the court disagreed with respondent’s main alternate ground for dismissal that plaintiff must wait to challenge the Board’s rezoning actions and permitting of the billboards.

tampa lawyer

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • Furl
  • MisterWong
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Do You Need Help?
We can evaluate your situation, offer you options and relate our experiences...

Fill out this form to get started or call (866) 862-6878 for a CONSULTATION

First:
Last:
Phone:
Email:
Zip Code:
Your Question:




SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline