(Tampa lawyer) Coyne’s & Co., Inc. v. Enesco, LLC
More info…
(U.S. 8th Cir., Commercial Law, Contracts, Copyright, Injury And Tort Law, Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets, Trademark) In a suit related to the early termination of a distributor agreement, denial of a preliminary injunction is affirmed where plaintiff could not demonstrate a likelihood of success on its claims since the distributor agreement was no longer in effect, and defendant’s termination of the agreement did not fall under the Minnesota Franchise Act’s termination requirements since plaintiff had never paid defendant a franchise fee.
Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Assocs.
(U.S. 9th Cir., Civil Procedure, Dispute Resolution & Arbitration, Intellectual Property, Trademark) In a declaratory action seeking to protect plaintiff’s interests in a trademark licensing agreement, district court order confirming an arbitration award is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) the arbitrator properly arbitrated equitable claims; 2) the arbitrator’s award is not completely irrational; 3) the arbitrator exceeded the scope of his authority by enjoining plaintiff’s non-party affiliates; and 4) the arbitrator’s award violates the California Business and Professions Code. Appeal of the district court order compelling arbitration is untimely and the court lacks jurisdiction to consider the issue.
Taco Bell Corp. v. TBWA Chiat/Day Inc.
(U.S. 9th Cir., Contracts, Entertainment Law, Food & Beverages, Intellectual Property, Media Law, Remedies) In a suit against an advertising agency seeking indemnification for damages entered against plaintiff in a suit based on plaintiff’s breach of an implied contract for using a third party’s Chihuahua character in advertising developed by defendant, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where the evidence only showed fault for the previous liability on the part of plaintiff, thus defendant owed no duty to indemnify.
Ball Aerosol
&
Specialty Container, Inc. v. Ltd. Brands, Inc.
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Consumer Products, Intellectual Property, Patent, Retail) In a patent case brought against defendants including Bath & Body Works involving a candle tin with a removable cover that also acts as a base for the candle holder, summary judgment of validity and infringement, an award of damages, and a denial of a motion for reconsideration is reversed where the district court erred as a matter of law in failing to find two claims of the patent at issue to have been obvious, and in finding infringement of those claims.
Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Drugs & Biotech, Health Law, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent case involving a drug-eluting expandable stent with a coating that has a non-thrombogenic surface, denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial and judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) following a jury verdict of infringement of a patent claim is reversed where the district court erred as a matter of law in failing to hold the patent at issue to have been obvious.
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.










