Florida Lawyer News Services | Robbins Equitas

(Tampa dui attorney) Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A., Inc.

More info…
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent infringement action involving a vehicle seat control system that provides massage capability, District Court’s of grant summary judgment of dismissal of the complaint because of Plaintiff’s failure to join an alleged co-inventor is reversed, where any contribution co-Defendant made to the invention was insignificant and therefore prevents it from attaining the status of a co-inventor.

Le v. Astrue

(U.S. 9th Cir., Civil Procedure, Government Benefits) In an action seeking Social Security disability benefits, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where the Court of Appeals was required to construe Plaintiff’s notice of appeal as encompassing the District Court’s entire disposition.

CIT Small Bus. Lending Corp. v. Kendrick

(U.S. 6th Cir., Bankruptcy Law, Civil Procedure) In an action to avoid a mortgage as a preferential transfer, Defendant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, where the District Court had remanded the matter to the Bankruptcy Court to determine the preferential transfer issue and thus there was no final order.

aviation accident lawyer

(St petersburg lawyer) Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd.

More info…
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent dispute concerning power inverter circuitry for laptop computers, judgment in favor of plaintiff is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in appointing an expert under the Federal Rules as it was confronted by an unusually complex case and starkly conflicting expert testimony; and 2) there was no error in the district court’s denial of defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on obviousness as there was substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding.

attorney in tampa

(Clearwater lawyer) Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A., Inc.

More info…
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent infringement action involving a vehicle seat control system that provides massage capability, District Court’s of grant summary judgment of dismissal of the complaint because of Plaintiff’s failure to join an alleged co-inventor is reversed, where any contribution co-Defendant made to the invention was insignificant and therefore prevents it from attaining the status of a co-inventor.

tampa divorce attorney