(Tampa personal injury attorney) Pinkerton v. Colo. DOT
More info…
(U.S. 10th Cir., Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law) In a Title VII sex discrimination action, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed, where: 1) there was no evidence of quid pro quo sexual harassment; and 2) Plaintiff’s termination could not be traced back to Plaintiff’s supervisor under the subordinate-bias theory.
Esquire Trade
&
Fin., Inc. v. CBQ, Inc.
(U.S. 2d Cir., Civil Procedure, Per Curiam, Securities Law) In an action for breaches of debenture-related agreements and for securities fraud, district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant on grounds that plaintiff’s claims were barred by res judicata is vacated and remanded where the order dismissing the earlier action between plaintiff and a third party does not operate as a res judicata bar to the claims raised in the present action as the required privity between the third party and defendant is not present.
World Fin. Group, Inc. v. HBW Ins.
&
Fin. Serv., Inc.
(Cal. App., Civil Procedure, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Government Law, Labor & Employment Law, Trade Secrets) In an action involving trade secrets and confidential information, trial court’s denial of defendant’s Anti-SLAPP motion to strike the complaint filed against them by plaintiff is affirmed where defendants failed to meet their burden of proof to show plaintiff’s complaint was based on defendant’s protected activity arising out of acts done in furtherance of their free speech rights.