(Tampa attorney) In re Kubin
More info…
(U.S. Fed. Cir., Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent action relating a classic biotechnology invention, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision rejection plaintiff’s patent application is affirmed where the Board did not err in rejecting plaintiff’s claims as obvious under 35 U.S.C. sec. 103(a), as plaintiff’s methodology in the patent was essentially the same as the methodologies and teachings in prior patents and scientific works.
Coquico, Inc. v. Rodrguez-Miranda
(U.S. 1st Cir., Copyright, Intellectual Property) In a copyright infringement action, district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction against defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff has a valid copyright; and 2) plaintiff has shown a likelihood of success that it will succeed on its claim that defendant copied original elements of its work as it has provided ample evidence that defendant engaged in actual copying of plaintiff’s work, and that the two works were substantially similar.
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.










