<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Florida Lawyer News and Events &#187; Florida Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/tag/florida-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press</link>
	<description>Business lawyers for business people...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa bankruptcy attorney) Beavers v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-bankruptcy-attorney-beavers-v-metro-life-ins-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-bankruptcy-attorney-beavers-v-metro-life-ins-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-bankruptcy-attorney-beavers-v-metro-life-ins-co/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 5th Cir., Civil Procedure, Contracts, Insurance Law) In an action alleging breach of life insurance investment contracts, the dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where the District Court correctly held that Plaintiffs&#8217; claims were barred by the Texas statute of limitations, because Plaintiffs&#8217; alleged injury was not inherently undiscoverable. County of Sonoma v. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-bankruptcy-attorney-beavers-v-metro-life-ins-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa florida lawyer) Brooks-Ngwenya v. Indianapolis Public Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-brooks-ngwenya-v-indianapolis-public-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-brooks-ngwenya-v-indianapolis-public-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-florida-lawyer-brooks-ngwenya-v-indianapolis-public-schools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 7th Cir., Copyright, Education Law, Intellectual Property, Per Curiam) In a copyright infringement action involving an educational program, district court&#8217;s grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where the copyright infringement claim fails as plaintiff&#8217;s complaint is that defendant copied her ideas but she did not prove or try to prove that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-brooks-ngwenya-v-indianapolis-public-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa dui attorney) Teselle v. McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-teselle-v-mcloughlin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-teselle-v-mcloughlin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-dui-attorney-teselle-v-mcloughlin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(Cal. App., Civil Procedure, Probate, Trusts &#038; Estates) In a dispute involving a trust, summary judgment for defendants is reversed where: 1) the late filing by plaintiff of an opposition statement did not violate the policies of Code Civ. Pro. section 437c (b)(2) or (b)(3) and thus was not sufficient grounds for granting summary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-teselle-v-mcloughlin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Florida lawyer) Felix v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-felix-v-am-honda-motor-co-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-felix-v-am-honda-motor-co-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/florida-lawyer-felix-v-am-honda-motor-co-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. Fed. Cir., Intellectual Property, Patent, Transportation) In a patent infringement action involving a storage system in a vehicle bed, district court&#8217;s grant of summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where there was no literal infringement of plaintiff&#8217;s patent as the court&#8217;s construction of the disputed terms in the patent was correct and thus [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-felix-v-am-honda-motor-co-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa florida lawyer) In re Sony BMG Entm&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-in-re-sony-bmg-entmt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-in-re-sony-bmg-entmt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-florida-lawyer-in-re-sony-bmg-entmt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 1st Cir., Civil Procedure, Copyright, Cyberspace Law, Entertainment Law, Intellectual Property, Media Law) In an action related to a copyright infringement trial, petition challenging an order permitting gavel-to-gavel webcasting of a hearing in a civil case is granted and the matter remanded where a district court judge does not have the authority to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-florida-lawyer-in-re-sony-bmg-entmt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa dui attorney) Synthes v. GMReis</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-synthes-v-gmreis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-synthes-v-gmreis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-dui-attorney-synthes-v-gmreis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. Fed. Cir., Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent infringement action involving a bone plating system, district court&#8217;s dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is reversed where although the court was correct in ruling that it did not have general jurisdiction over defendant, it erred in its ruling that it lacked specific [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-dui-attorney-synthes-v-gmreis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
