Florida Lawyer News Services | Robbins Equitas

Court Rules In Favor of Homeowners In Pickup Truck Parking Dispute

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tampa, Florida (December 15, 2008) – Chalk one up for the little guy. A Hillsborough County Circuit Court Judge has ruled in favor in of a Tampa Bay couple in a lawsuit filed against them by their homeowners association. The homeowners, A.J. and Doree Vizzi, were sued last year by The Eagles Master Association. The association wanted to prevent them from parking their pickup truck in their driveway, which they had done for 9 years before the lawsuit was filed.

The association claimed the Vizzi’s had violated one of the provisions of the documents governing homes located within The Eagles, a gated community in northwest Hillsborough County. In its lawsuit, the association says pickup trucks are prohibited from being parked in driveways and must be parked in a garage at all times. Circuit Court Judge Martha J. Cook ruled in favor of the Vizzi’s, finding the association’s interpretation of the parking restriction “utterly unreasonable.” The court said the more rational interpretation of the documents is “to require commercial vehicles, which are deemed unsightly in a residential environment, to be garaged and out of the public’s view.”

In response to the lawsuit, the Vizzi’s claimed they were never given a copy of the document containing the pickup parking restriction when they purchased their home in 1997. According to the Vizzi’s, a representative of the developer, U.S. Home, told them that pickup trucks were not restricted. The Vizzi’s also said they did not receive any notice of their alleged violation of the restriction until 2001 – four years after they purchased their home. The Vizzi’s contended that the association has selectively enforced the provision by granting some homeowners exemptions, and permitting the owners of other vehicles classified by the DMV as trucks to park their vehicle outside of a garage.

Attorney Daniel Anderson, of the law firm Robbins Equitas, represented the Vizzi’s. He said the parking provision “looks like something written by Yogi Berra,” and “the association’s interpretation of the provision just makes no sense at all.” Anderson said the court did not base its judgment on the selective enforcement issues raised by the Vizzi’s but limited its ruling to an interpretation of the legal documents governing the Vizzis’ home. Anderson said the court has not yet ruled on the Vizzis’ counterclaim against the association, which the court said must be submitted to arbitration.

Anderson said the association may continue the litigation and force the Vizzi’s to submit their claim to arbitration in an effort to avoid paying some of the Vizzi’s attorneys fees. “I thought the association would drop the lawsuit when it became clear there was no way they could win,” Anderson said. “They’re like the EverReady bunny of homeowners association litigation, they just keep going and going and going,” he said.

According to Anderson, pursuing the lawsuit entails a substantial risk for other Eagles homeowners who may be stuck with a legal bill that could amount to well over $100,000. “In these economic times, I cannot imagine that the other Eagles homeowners will be happy to learn that they may be subject to a special assessment in order to pay the attorneys fees incurred by both the association and the Vizzi’s,” Anderson said. According to Anderson, Eagles residents previously voted more than 3 to 1 in favor of eliminating pickup truck parking restrictions altogether. “One would think the association would have gotten the hint that maybe its members aren’t very excited about suing people for parking pickup trucks in their driveway,” Anderson said.

The Eagles board of directors is holding a closed door meeting tonight and Anderson said he believes board members will be discussing the recent ruling. “I hope they do right thing and work with us to bring an end to this litigation,” Anderson said, “we need to stop wasting the limited resources of our courts and get off of this crazy train.”

Judge Martha J. Cook’s
Order Granting Motion For Summary Judgment