<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Florida Lawyer News and Events &#187; Tampa Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/tag/tampa-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press</link>
	<description>Business lawyers for business people...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa lawyer) A.V. v. iParadigms, LLC</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-av-v-iparadigms-llc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-av-v-iparadigms-llc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-lawyer-av-v-iparadigms-llc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 4th Cir., Copyright, Cyberspace Law, Intellectual Property) In a copyright infringement action based on the archiving of student papers on Defendant&#8217;s website, judgment for Defendant on Plaintiff&#8217;s claims is affirmed, where the archiving was transformative because its purpose was to prevent plagiarism by comparative use, but judgment for Plaintiff on Defendant&#8217;s counterclaims is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-av-v-iparadigms-llc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa lawyer) Shimon v. Sewerage &amp; Water Bd.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-shimon-v-sewerage-water-bd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-shimon-v-sewerage-water-bd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-lawyer-shimon-v-sewerage-water-bd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 5th Cir., Civil Procedure, Construction, Injury And Tort Law) In a negligence action regarding flood control construction projects, the dismissal of Defendant&#8217;s third-party complaint is affirmed, where Defendant&#8217;s claims were barred by res judicata due to a prior state court action. tampa dui attorney]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-shimon-v-sewerage-water-bd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Florida lawyer) Rescuecom Corp. v. Google Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-rescuecom-corp-v-google-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-rescuecom-corp-v-google-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/florida-lawyer-rescuecom-corp-v-google-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 2d Cir., Intellectual Property, Trademark) In an action brought under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and dilution, the district court&#8217;s dismissal for failure to state a claim is reversed and remanded where plaintiff&#8217;s allegations that Google&#8217;s recommendation and sale of its mark to Google&#8217;s advertisers, so as to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/florida-lawyer-rescuecom-corp-v-google-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(St petersburg lawyer) McMahon v. City of Los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/st-petersburg-lawyer-mcmahon-v-city-of-los-angeles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/st-petersburg-lawyer-mcmahon-v-city-of-los-angeles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/st-petersburg-lawyer-mcmahon-v-city-of-los-angeles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(Cal. App., Civil Procedure, Government Law, Labor &#038; Employment Law) In an action involving disclosure of information in a police officer&#8217;s personnel files, trial court&#8217;s denial of plaintiff&#8217;s petition for writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1085 to compel disclosure is affirmed where the police department complied with its obligations under [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/st-petersburg-lawyer-mcmahon-v-city-of-los-angeles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Tampa lawyer) Central Iowa Power Coop. v. Midwest Indep. Transmission Sys. Operator, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-central-iowa-power-coop-v-midwest-indep-transmission-sys-operator-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-central-iowa-power-coop-v-midwest-indep-transmission-sys-operator-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/tampa-lawyer-central-iowa-power-coop-v-midwest-indep-transmission-sys-operator-inc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. 8th Cir., Civil Procedure, Public Utilities) In a dispute involving compensation for use of power transmission facilities, district court&#8217;s judgment is reversed where the court erred by denying plaintiff&#8217;s motion to remand as the the resolution of plaintiff&#8217;s state court claims does not necessarily depend on the resolution of substantial questions of federal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/tampa-lawyer-central-iowa-power-coop-v-midwest-indep-transmission-sys-operator-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Lawyer in tampa) Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.</title>
		<link>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/lawyer-in-tampa-ariad-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-eli-lilly-and-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/lawyer-in-tampa-ariad-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-eli-lilly-and-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>SEO-FSER</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[External articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/articles-of-interest/lawyer-in-tampa-ariad-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-eli-lilly-and-co/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More info&#8230;(U.S. Fed. Cir., Drugs &#038; Biotech, Intellectual Property, Patent) In a patent infringement action involving drugs related to gene regulation, district court&#8217;s judgment against defendant is reversed in part and affirmed in part where: 1) the court lacked substantial evidence for its verdict that the asserted claims of plaintiff&#8217;s patent were supported by adequate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.floridalawyer.com/press/2009/04/lawyer-in-tampa-ariad-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-eli-lilly-and-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

